The creation of secondary raw materials via the recycling route also
expends far less energy than production based on primary raw materials.
Recycling affords the following energy savings compared to this primary
route:
| Steel |
74% |
| Aluminium |
95% |
| Copper |
85% |
| Lead |
65% |
| Paper |
64% |
| Plastics |
80% |
Furthermore, it has been calculated that producing paper via the
recycling route entails 35% less water pollution and 74% less air
pollution. Meanwhile, producing steel from scrap means 86% less air
pollution.
The recycling industry's contribution to protecting the environment
would not be possible without its massive expenditure on often highly
sophisticated plant, machinery and equipment. Indeed, it has been
calculated that the industry - which comprises a large proportion of
privately-owned enterprises - invests around US$ 20 billion each year
on new equipment and research & development.
Recycling is as old as humanity itself and may well have been born when
a stone age hunter splintered his flint axe and realised that the
fragments would make excellent arrowheads. It truly came into its own
with the industrial revolution when redundant ferrous and non-ferrous
metals became standard feedstock for the metallurgical industries.
Furthermore, it was found that recovered paper could be reduced to its
original pulp form and so made into new paper.
Recycling may have been breathing new life into obsolete products and
materials for thousands of years but conservation of the planet's
resources has become a particularly high-profile issue over recent
decades. Some of this attention has focused on, for example, how to
increase demand for products with a recycled content and how to design
new products with their future recycling in mind. The recycling
industry is not responsible for the initial design of the products they
recover and yet, thanks to its experience and expertise in this area,
it has been instrumental in devising innovative recycling solutions. At
the same time, the industry has consistently argued in favour of
recycling being taken into account at earliest stage of a product's
development.
The influence of the recycling industry has extended into many other
areas of critical commercial, environmental and social importance -
such as radioactivity in scrap. At United Nations level, for example,
the industry has promoted a logical system to encourage co-operation
between all those forced to deal with this potential problem, including
smelters, recycling operators, governments and disposers of radioactive
residues.
BIR and its affiliated organisations have led the recycling industry's
response to a vast range of new legislation covering everything from
end-of-life vehicles and waste electrical and electronic equipment, to
waste shipment regulations. The legislative burden imposed on the
recycling industry has become far heavier over recent years, with some
of the new rules and regulations appearing to be detrimental to
recycling as a whole. Particularly problematical has been the decision
by some legislators to regard recyclables as "waste" rather than as
valuable secondary raw materials for which consuming industries are
prepared to pay a market price. Indeed, definition of recyclables as
"waste" has threatened to hinder the international trade in this
indispensable commodity.
All countries with industrial production capacity have a need to
consume raw materials and so demand for recycled commodities is truly
global. International trade in secondary materials is necessary to
supply steelworks, foundries, paper mills, textiles industry and rubber
etc. with feedstock material for further environmentally sound
production. As the focus of industrial production shifts away from
industrialised nations towards the developing world, so there is also a
shift in flows of secondary raw materials. Today, for example, huge
volumes of scrap metal recovered from end-of-life products in the
Western World are being shipped to China and other,
rapidly-industrialising countries in Asia.
In its discussions with the United Nations, the OECD and other
supra-national bodies, world recycling body BIR and its various member
federations and associations have battled over many years to remove the
"waste" label from its products. In addition, BIR has always strongly
advocated the free flow of secondary material between nations and, by
mutual efforts, has succeeded in breaking down many trade barriers. The
organisation has had to remain vigilant to the constant threat posed by
import and export restrictions as well as other protectionist measures.
In recent times, for example, BIR and the US Institute of Scrap
Recycling Industries (ISRI) have played a pivotal role in smoothing the
flow of recyclables to China by working with the nation's regulators to
create a workable registration regime for overseas exporters to the
country.